What David Cameron means by "Progressive"

On 7th November 2003, upon Michael Howard's election to leadership of the Conservative Party I blogged on progressive politics. The posting from my other blog Ironies, linked here, seems worth repeating in full, so that today's voters may be fully aware of what is meant when Cameron states that the Conservative Party is "Progressive".

Friday, November 07, 2003

"Multilateralism, Transnational Progessivism, the Aqui Communitaire and Howard's Tories."

The French have chosen to label the nature of their foreign policy differences Multilateralism versus Unilateralism. In countering what they see as the threat of the latter (America making all the world?s big decisions on its own) they propose in particular a bi-polar rather than uni-polar world (in reality an EU superstate acting as a counterweight to American power, and
influence). An important tool in achieving this aim, the EU being a military pygmy alongside the US, is the United Nations.

Iraq threw these conflicting views to the front of the world stage. Following the Kuwait invasion the UN had imposed various sanctions, no-fly zones etc., upon Iraq. The burden of implementation fell mainly upon the US aided by Britain. As the years passed the suspicion formed in my mind that other major countries, while paying lip service to the UN mandated restraints, sought maximum commercial advantage from their non-involvement in the enforcement process and benefit from the latent oil wealth of Saddam?s oppressed nation.
(This may or may not have been a factor in what followed).

After 9/11 and the defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan, attention turned to Iraq where the UN arms inspectors had been withdrawn and Saddam Hussein was in growing breach of many UN resolutions. At this point the limits of multilateralism were reached. This is most easily illustrated by looking at the concept from an American viewpoint.

Transnational Progressivism was the expression coined by Jonn Fonte in a paper 'The Ideological War within the West' published a year before 9/11 and is essential reading. A summary can be read from this link:

'Transnational Progressivism'

The full version in pdf can be read from this other link:

'Liberal Democracy vs. Transnational Progressivism: The Future of the Ideological Civil War Within the West'

Those without the time to visit either link can follow the reasoning of this posting with this very brief extract:

The idea of transnationalism as a major conceptual tool. Transnationalism is the next stage of multicultural ideology. Like multiculturalism, transnationalism is a concept that provides elites with both an empirical tool (a plausible analysis of what is) and an ideological framework (a vision of what should be). Transnational advocates argue that globalization requires some form of "global governance" because they believe that the nation-state and the idea of national citizenship are ill suited to deal with the global problems of the future.

AS Fonte then went on to point out in his paper, the EU is the "STRONGHOLD OF TRANSNATIONAL PROGRESSIVISM Its governmental structure is post-democratic. Power in the EU principally resides in the European Commission (EC) and to a lesser extent the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The EC, the EU's executive body, initiates legislative action, implements common policy, and controls a large bureaucracy.... It is unelected and, for the most part, unaccountable."

The lable chosen by the EU to describe this concept is not of course that coined by Fonte, but rather the concept described as 'Aqui Communitaire'. This is generally taken to mean: "whatever power is once obtained by the EU from the previously sovereign nation states it will never relinquish". As such it has now been proposed in the present IGC, as the principal guiding aim of the Constitutional Treaty absorbing and supplementing the earlier
concept of 'ever closer union'. It presumably incorporates all the concepts of 'Transnational Progressivism' as detailed in Fonte's paper.

Iraq and the UN Security Council was where the clash between liberal democracy and this newly defined concept really first occurred and where the fatalflaws of joint action are now becoming visible. The skirmishing over the ICC was a warning sign.

France and Germany had approved the various UN resolutions that gradually brought the Iraq situation to a head. They concurred with the various warnings issued by the Security Council, and were aware of the troop build-up by the USA and Britain around Iraq. Their own Generals would have advised them that such deployment necessitated a resolution of the matter, if by military means before the onset of the summer heat of 2003.

The gradual increasing of pressure on Saddam Hussein therefore had a fixed time limit. Of which it later seemed France and Germany chose to feign ignorance. Just as today the logical endpoint of their Multilateralist policy for Iraq continues to call for a UN solution, when the reality is clear to all that this organisation has neither the wherewithal, ability or desire to have anything to do with matters that require making hard choices in potentially extremely hostile environments. The UN has turned and fled following heavy and tragic casualties, unhappily many brought about by inefficiencies within its own organisation.

Yesterday in Washington President Bush spoke to the National Endowment for Democracy, and made a landmark speech setting out hugely ambitious aims for democracy across the Middle East. Having earlier signed an aid package from the USA for eighty seven and a half billion dollars in the form of grants for Iraq he shamed the Europeans in both the loftiness of America's thinking and the depths of America's pockets.

Transnational Progressivism and the cul de sac of the Aqui Communitaire stand shamed and naked. The extent of the failure of the European Union's economic experiment with the Euro, was simultaneously stunningly spelt out in the first press conference of Jean-Claude Trichet the shoehorned-in new French President of the ECB, whose early ousting of Wim Duisenberg epitomises the workings of the 'aqui communitaire' concept in practice.

Meantime Britain has been caught in the middle. Or it had been up until midday. From that moment, with the appointment of Michael Howard as leader of the Conservative opposition party it appeared Transnational Progressivism has been embraced by the last of the three main political parties within the country.

Michael Howard had earlier made much play of his intention of leading from the centre. He had indeed openly courted those with whom he had earlier been seen to have huge and fundamental disagreements over the most important policy matter of this age, namely Britain?s relationship with the anti-nation state, non-democratic and 'transnational progressivist' EU.

The BBC reported the new Tory leader to have said the following:

"We must rediscover the habit of thinking the best of each other. We must rediscover the virtues of mutual support and friendship.
Let us, in this party that vaunts its belief in personal responsibility, each resolve that we will, all of us, assume a personal responsibility for the success of our endeavour.
No bystanders. No snipers from the sidelines. Every one of us a fully engaged participant in the great battle of hearts and minds and ideas.
Because we have an extraordinary common thread that binds us all together.
We all want to see a Conservative government elected. We are all crew on what at its best is the most superb campaigning vessel politics has ever known."

Translated of course , this means, we must forget our deeply held ideological beliefs, give up all thought of proposing to do what we know is best and right for the country and merely work together in order to gain power.

Exactly what Blair did in driving New Labour to Government with no purpose other than power itself, with the ruination of the nation as its result.

Another fitting analogy would be Chamberlain with Hitler and Mussolini. Suppressing his ideological instincts to buy something that appeared more comfortable or desirable however temporary.

The extraordinary thing about the timing of this change within the Conservative Party, is that it comes at a moment when the tide is beginning to turn. Schroeder this week seemed to step back from his support of the EU defence commitment. The folly of recent French domestic policies and questioning of Foreign policy errors are all the talk of Paris.

The consensus within Europe that Howard and the Tories are belatedly rushing to embrace is cracking. 'Transnational Progressivism' and the 'Aqui Communitaire' can be beaten, and indeed the first signs it might be in retreat are only now appearing. In Britain, however, we now have no political party to take the battle forward.

posted by Martin at 11/07/2003 07:49:00 AM

Cameron's ludicrous NHS ring fence receives public's contempt (or NOT?)

The video should be viewed from 5 minutes 32 seconds onwards.




Now watch the first few moments of this:



Somewhere here in the live broadcast I recall huge applause for Cable's "no ring fence" assertion, it seems to have disappeared.

Am I mistaken? Those in the UK can visit the Channel 4 replay to find out, unavailable for me go here.

Top Tories to get 2 more years to rip off the taxpayers.

Senior members of the present Shadow Cabinet are among the highest claimants for unjustified second home mortgage claims in the present House of Commons.

The new rules issued yesterday, will allow this scam to continue for a further two years for sitting MPs although new members will only able to claim for single roomed accommodation in London.

Yet more reason to withdraw your vote from any MP who has sat in this most corrupt of all Parliaments. Let a new start begin and some spring cleaning commence.

Surely present Cabinet Members have no chance of re-election even without this further consideration?

Time runs out for the Tories!

A Reuters poll by MORI produced at lunchtime today, read here, showing the Tories well behind in their targeted marginal constituencies hopefully spells the beginning of the end for the Ashcroft/Cameron/Hague/Osborne clique who have had their heads in the sands for many months. Their destruction of the Conservative Party may, however, be no bad thing. The voters must now reject all three of the corrupted main parties. More on this may be read from my first post of today on Ironies Too, linked here.

A Cartoon says it all on Cameron's Conservative Party

The cartoon in question is in today's The Independent, linked here.

This blog urged Hague's constituency party to de-select him some time ago.

Who will UKIP choose to run against him I wonder? See Ukip Uncovered today, linked here.

Cameron implodes on Jeff Randall Live

The Conservative election campaign crashed into the buffers at full speed last evening when the party's clearly clueless Leader showed he had no grasp whatever on any issue. The following comment on the party's favourite blog Conservative Home, contributing to a discussion thread on the latest awful opinion poll result, summed it up well as follows:

Danielle said...

You want to know why we are slipping in the polls. Watch Jeff Randall interview Cameron on sky about ten minutes ago. A complete f*****g disaster. He defended cutting defence but increasing aid, was not at all convincing on immigration and completely lied about Europe. It was a complete car crash. Randall was excellent though and is an example to other journalists of the type of issues that the voters really want answers on. How can the conservative party stand by while Cameron is pushing these policies. Maybe it is about time we took a lead from our cousins in Australia and got rid of Cameron like they got rid of Turnbull.

Reply Monday, February 22, 2010 at 20:01

More reporting linked here.

Cameron maxing his mortgage

The Times, among others, reports that MPs might have to repay capital gains made on second homes accrued thanks to publicly financed allowances. The BBC suggests that this will only apply from last November, presumably therefore revealing that this is in fact now a new con designed to get the taxpayer to cover capital losses in the face of yet another almost certain property price collapse!

As has been the subject of many postings on our sister blogs Ironies and Ironies Too down the years the only real solution will be to claw back funds paid to existing MPs through their future unwarranted pension arrangements.

The recovering of money received by MPs claimed when operating within the so-called 'rules' of what has laughably been called 'the system', such as the scam operated by David Cameron and reported in the Daily Mail, read here, should be among the first to be called in, possibly with penalty payments because of the sophistication of the serial abuse and the claimant's continuing protestations that he himself has done nothing wrong.

Of course not voting for his party or any of their candidates in the coming general election would be the most sensible and obvious first step.

The full BBC interview from which this quotation is taken may be read from here.

Parliamentary privilege is the people's protection

David Cameron is proposing a new law to suspend the protection accorded MPs by parliamentary privilege according to a report in the Daily Telegraph, linked here, this morning.

David Cameron is therefore proposing that he can assume dictatorial powers should the electorate be stupid enough to vote him into office. The article contains the following quote:

Announcing that charges would be brought against the four, Kier Stamer, the Director of Public Prosecutions said the four parliamentarians had raised a defence of parliamentary privilege.

He said: “We have considered that question and concluded that the applicability and extent of any parliamentary privilege claimed should be tested in court.”

The whole issue of the 1689 Bill of Rights, the treason of the Parliamentarians who voted for the Lisbon Treaty in light of its hidden powers now being revealed regarding the conditions the EU could impose on Greece following a financial bail-out and Cameron's shameful ignorance of the constitutional implications of his ill-thought through attacks on our parliamentary procedures will form the topic of a blog on Ironies Too later this week.

Cameron should heed Kipling





England only seeks fairness, those with "lots of Scot's blood" flowing through their veins should heed Rudyard Kipling! The complete poem Norman and Saxon may be read from here.

Norman and Saxon


"My son," said the Norman Baron, "I am dying, and you will
be heir
To all the broad acres in England that William gave me for
share
When he conquered the Saxon at Hastings, and a nice little
handful it is.
But before you go over to rule it I want you to understand this:--

"The Saxon is not like us Normans. His manners are not so polite.
But he never means anything serious till he talks about justice
right.
When he stands like an ox in the furrow--with his sullen set eyes
on your own,
And grumbles, 'This isn't fair dealing,' my son, leave the Saxon
alone.

David Cameron knows the Barnett Formula is unfair to England, see his reply to Andrew Marr, posted below. David Cameron should be warned in the coming election that advice framed by Rudyard Kipling for Normans goes for the Picts as well.

Of course Cameron will do nothing to help the English, he is committed to the Barnett formula, the effect of which is to manufacture a huge subsidy flowing ever faster North across the border to Scotland!

Why is this the case? Who knows, but perhaps the answer lies in his response to a question once posed by fellow Scot, Andrew Marr, as seen and quoted in the posting that follows.

ANDREW MARR: Sure - another area of constitutional argument just at the moment is the whole business of the Scots and the English. Lots of people are saying now there should be English votes for English laws - Ken Clarke is clearly attracted by that - and there's quite hubbub now saying that the Scots are getting too much public money, that the old Barnett formula, in fact Joel Barnett himself has said this, needs to be looked at again. Are the Scots getting too much public money at the moment, proportionately?

DAVID CAMERON: I don't have any plans to change the arrangements. Obviously we're in opposition, we have the opportunity to look at these things and we should do so. But I don't have any plans to make changes. And we should look at funding on the basis of need. And I think that's the right way, right way round. But I want, you know, I am a passionate Unionist, I think that Scotland brings a huge amount to the United Kingdom. The Scottish people bring a huge amount to the United Kingdom and I don't want, and I'm a Cameron, there is quite a lot of Scottish blood flowing through these veins.

Full interview linked here.

More sense from Spirit of Stead.

In The Independent to an article from John Rentoul, linked here, comes this:

Re-invigorating politics

spiritofstead wrote:

Thursday, 14 January 2010 at 09:05 am (UTC)

"...An anti-politics election.... is a dismal, life-denying prospect" writes Mr Rentoul, but unlike the ordinary voter, commentators such as he, are at least in a position to do something about this anti-political environment resulting from the continual lying and dishonesty of our political class.

Put aside for a moment any analysis of how we arrived at this state of affairs and then consider only the characters, not the party nor the apparent politics, of our future leadership teams. Those we must now choose to govern us. I would suggest that on character most people would probably select the team offered by the Liberal Democrats. Certainly on the economy which will be the main concern of the next parliament, polls show Vince Cable is head and shoulders above the two potential alternatives. The expenses scandal also has the Lib/Dems emerging ahead of their sleaze-ridden alternatives.

I believe the EU is the greatest threat to democracy and self-governance that this country has ever faced. Nick Clegg argued convincingly on the need for an in/out referendum at the time of his shameful reneging on his party's referendum promise. He has now removed that pledge from his party's commitments, yet all the arguments he then made still stand.

Whatever the result of such a referendum it is clearly essential for all must see part of the poisoning of our politics is the reality of our weakened parliament post-Lisbon.

If the air can be cleared a new politics could emerge when our politicians could address the real issues, not claim to undertake actions on matters only open to Brussels. Either addressing all the challenges of renewed national independence in a near bankrupt condition - or making the EU accountable (and crazy dream - democratic) from within.

The Lib/Dems should commit to an in/out referendum as a confirmed policy which would become their prime condition for any power sharing deal after the election. They would then have the potential support of 80% of the nation who state they want a referendum - better yet the real issues facing the country would come to the forefront of the campaign and British politics would cease to be the complete farce our money-grubbing main parties have allowed it to become.

The NHS is a waste of money!

Vapid Cameron was on TV this morning, I could not watch as his fatuousness makes me ill.

Fraser Nelson, here, of the Spectator reports:
+++++
3. “We have a very frank and clear and positive message - the NHS is our no.1 priority, we do not want to see the state withdraw from that in any shape or form.” I do hope this was another of his mis-speaking moments. Alan Milburn explicitly wanted to see the state withdraw, and said the NHS should be regarded as a payment mechanism. It was the trade unions who fought Blair, saying they didn’t want to see the state withdraw from the NHS in any shape or form. Cameron seems to be clear about where he stands on this dividing line. He is retreating from the NHS reform agenda, and the NHS (and patient care) will be the worse for it.
+++++

As cuts in defence, education, policing and every other area of national life presently funded by a grossly over-staffed and incompetent state become evident even to the mass of morons who never read a sensible publication will not this pledge become an electoral liability?

Has nobody yet realized within the Conservative Party leadership, that all expenditure on health other than for pain relief is eventually wasted as we all must die?

Even morons will one day begin to question why all else of value that often makes life worthwhile - such as safe streets as one example - must be sacrificed to keep the sick and aged alive, often on a basis lacking either dignity or apparent point!

"Spectator" Editor agrees Cameron is 'VAPID'

In a stinging attack on the Leader of the Conservative Party by the Conservative supporting weekly magazine 'The Spectator' the original assessment of Cameron's pathetic leadership by this blog (here) on his first election is confirmed mere months (perhaps weeks) before the country's most crucial election, by stating the following:

"I describe the speech as vapid nonsense." Read here.

My posting of December 2005 is repeated below:

'Vapid' Cameron looks set to win

The Conservative Party appears headed for oblivion today. We will know at four o'clock Brussels time.

If the Bookies, press and pundits are correct then the nothing that seems to be David Cameron (who this blog will refer to in future as 'Vapid') will ostensibly take over the leadership of Britain's still main opposition party.

With Simon Hughes seemingly positioning the LibDems to steal the English Democrats clothing that may not long be the case!

The British people can hardly be worse served if the leadership result is as predicted. The English people even less so!

This might make one think!

Read this and WEEP!!!

Cameron writes that Britain can be cheerful about 2010 in the Mail on Sunday

Cameron and Hague shamed as Ashcroft named a Tax Non-Dom in the Commons!

What can the Conservatives possibly be thinking of to have a Deputy Chairman who was always certain to attract this kind of attention as the election approached. Read the Evening Standard report from here?????

Crazed Cameron commits 20 billion non-existent cash on climate con.

Watch the video I posted last evening and then marvel at the article in The Guardian this morning, linked here, which is the apt vehicle to demonstrate Vapid Cameron's latest demonstration of his having cast off from reality.

The business editor of the Daily Telegraph has a much more realistic, albeit thinly veiled, warning as to the real danger now facing the nation, namely civil unrest following sovereign debt default, read here.

As Cameron has himself rashly stated Britain is virtually bankrupt, just where does he imagine he will find 20,000,000,000 pounds to spend on climate gimmicks. Yesterday huge cuts were announced in Britain's defence spending to buy just 22 helicopters which will arrive too late for the purpose for which they are today required. Meanwhile the necessary cuts are only forecast to yield 900,000,000 pounds.

Cameron's government, if elected, will be facing deficits right across all the public services which most of the public consider untouchable. Yet he proposes ring fencing overseas aid? How does he imagine he is going to pay out the dole, the teachers, the police... Lord Ashcroft's charitable donations from his legitimate UK businesses perhaps?

Lord Monkton on the Climate Con!

Lord Monckton on Climategate at the 2nd International Climate Conference from CFACT on Vimeo.

Gerald Howarth MP is latest to be publicly shamed

The Shadow Defence Minister, Gerald Howarth MP, read here, was the latest to be humiliated on the TV Politics Show today.

The small group of financially driven individuals, seeking to gain power by coercing the now clearly reluctant Vapid Cameron to stand for the premiership, claimed another one-time previously fairly unsullied political scalp today. This follows the public humiliation of Philip Hammond MP, which occurred yesterday as reported below.

Howarth was repeatedly asked as Shadow Defence Minister whether he would ring fence defence spending from cuts while Overseas Development continued untouched as is the electorally gimmicky stance of the Cameroons. Lamentably the only response in supposed defence of his non-stance he could offer was that he was a Conservative.

Andrew Neil's tone of contempt when he retorted that he already knew that, carried every ounce of loathing that the nation must feel for a once proud party whose senior members are one by one called to crawl through the mire and traduce any principle they once may have claimed, to place into power the mostly nameless men and women of the so-called Cameroons who allow this charade to continue.

Cameroon's trash last traces of decency in lust for PM's powers

The ICM poll headlined in today's Guardian, linked here, show a further fall in support for the main opposition party to a Government that has lost every shred of respect throughout the country.

This poll was mostly taken before the weekend disaster of the phony parliamentary full taxation announcement made by Cameron on Sunday morning (see our two posts immediately beneath this).

This was also before Philip Hammond, one of the only effective Shadow Cabinet members, was sent forth into the broadcast studios of the BBC Radio 4 Today programme and the BBC 2 TV Daily Politics Show, to completely destroy any future political effectiveness he may once of possessed by uselessly trying to defend the indefensible in support of the tax status of the unspeakable.

The country requires an effective opposition. The Conservatives under Cameron, (who apparently now even lacks the drive to crave the post of PM, my view is that he is now in a complete funk over the gravity of the situation he will face), are now allowing not only the party name defining the previous philosophy of its one-time supporters to be suborned to Blairism, but also trashing the probity of even its still decent members on whom the hope for a national revival should depend!

Cameron is unfit to Lead

Earlier today I reported on the ill-considered, indeed lunatic, announcement from the leader of the main opposition party that in future he expects his supporters in the Commons and Lords to pay their taxes.

What he said was bad enough as may now be viewed on the Sky News web site linked here, but on further reflection the manner of its presentation was even worse.

Cameron appeared not only as every inch a person of zero drive and ambition, clearly evident in every word he spoke, but worse still, dressed as a man without the slightest intention, or indeed interest, in ever leading a country. Well certainly not one carrying any clout in the World.

Visit the website yourself, while still available to see what I mean ....... anybody seeking a part-time gardener in Witney or environs in Oxfordshire???????? They know where to look!

Cameron to clampdown on Zac and Ashcroft after the election!

An extraordinarily stupid announcement, even by Cameron's standards has just been announced on Sky News by the Conservative Party leader:

Once elected he will pass a law requiring all parliamentarians to be proper UK Tax Payers, he thus at a stroke confirms:

AAA First he wants to buy the elections courtesy of the money from the likes of Ashcroft and Zac!

BBB He accepts that not all conservative candidates or peers are presently full UK tax payers.

This from a man who supposes himself to have the integrity to lead the Nation.

Seeking an Alternative!!

A BBC poll reported on The Daily Politics today had the Conservative Party economic team leaders only trusted by 33 per cent of respondents for handling the economy.

Amazing that one third of the electorate are still taken in by the two incompetents, Cameron and Osborne, after the latest release of expense details!

How, night after night on the Television News programmes are Cameron and Osborne silent as typically this eveninf, the MOD budget is reported 6 billion out of funds, the A400M programme alone being billions overspent as it makes its first long delayed maiden flight, the Gilts market in turmoil etc., etc., etc.

Those of us hoping for a reasonable alternative might take heart from a rumour coming my way this evening, namely that an Alliance of Euro-sceptic, Pro English Parliament, Anti-Sleaze parties is emerging for the 2010 General Election expected to fight approximately 360 seats in the General Election in Great Britain.

It is expected to be named “Alliance for Democracy” they apparently include the following:

Christian Party

English Democrats

Jury Team

Popular Alliance

UFK

Veritas (I had not realised this latter still existed either!)

A Country Careering towards Chaos and Collapse

The Darling Pre-Budget Report yesterday in Parliament was a disaster!

The disgraceful deceit which underlay its every paragraph was a fitting culmination for twelve and a half years of deception which has turned the entire government machine into a self-serving machine to deliver and finance the ever-deeper decadence of the close-knit, mainly Scottish group at its centre.

The following passage apparently ignored by the mainstream media this morning is telling:

As a result, I am today able to offer guaranteed minimum real-terms increases in front-line NHS and schools spending for two years from 2011, as well as providing sufficient funding to maintain the number of police and community support officers. That means that I can confirm not just that we will increase spending as planned next year on hospitals, schools and policing, but we can pledge that spending on these crucial front-line services will continue to rise over and above inflation
9 Dec 2009 : Column 371
after 2010-11, so that we can meet the improved public service guarantees and entitlements that we have set out. There will of course be Barnett consequentials for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The proof of the emptiness underlying the plans was further evidenced by the shameful interview provided to the BBC Today programme on Radio 4 this morning by Alistair Darling.

The problem for the English nation, who have now been clearly warned that yet more years of financial chicanery is planned, is that the leaders of the two main opposition parties, who may now well share power after the election, is that both have been picked by their party members for their similarity to that supreme confidence trickster Tony Blair.

Cameron and Clegg, therefore, not only seem to both lack character and experience but apparently are most adept at the glib presentation of inconsequential but eye-catching fads. Neither, it must be suspected from their backgrounds and actions may be expected to champion the English in their present situation of financial servitude to the nations at the periphary of the British Isles. ( Indeed thefirst and only truly substantive policy statement yet heard from Cameron was that the Barnett Formula was untouchable).

New Labour now have a few more months to further wreck Britain.

The tragedy for England and therefore Britain, is that there is as yet no leading opposition figure who appears to have the chance to emerge to put things to rights.

Members of the Conservative and Liberal Democratic Parties can act now to remove Clegg and Cameron or sit back and await the misery that the PBR makes clear is now heading straight towards them.

In the personal certainty no such thing will happen, can we now see more robust and honest campaigning on the economy from the UKIP and the English Democrats? Please

(Post copied to UKIP Uncovered Blog and the English Democrats via email)

The Times Populus Poll has Tory lead cut to 8%

Hope appears for the country as 'Dave' Cameron enters the area of polling where even the blinkered Tories may consider a change of Leader and more importantly party direction.

Read the strangely reported results in The Times from here.

Ken Clarke deliberately sold out Britain - Bruges Group

Excerpts from the latest Bruges Group report are as follows:

British taxpayers will lose at least £9.7 billion due to rulings by the European Court of Justice. Commentators on the HSBC SDRT case have suggested that it will cost up to £5 billion, the UK Government's estimate for the FII GLO case is that it will cost taxpayers another £4.7 billion, and the estimated total of those (£9.7 billion) does not even taken into account the Thin Cap GLO or the Cadbury Schweppes CFC tax cases, both of which the Government is currently fighting in the courts.

Yet these tax blows to the nation’s finances, coming at a time when the Government is struggling with our huge national debt, could have been prevented. However, Ken Clarke and his successor, Gordon Brown, as Chancellor failed to act on advice to amend EU tax rules. Now the only option to protect British tax law from EU interference is for the UK to regain its freedom.

Sensational evidence produced in a recent tax case¹ shows that Ken Clarke, when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer, failed to defend the UK’s tax rights, despite clear warnings from Inland Revenue officials that the ECJ would erode the UK's tax base. Furthermore, it is highly likely that his successor, Gordon Brown, also failed to act. Warned, as early as 1994, that the only solution was for the UK to obtain clear tax exemptions from the EU, then either from incompetence or neglect, Clarke ignored advice, probably also given to Brown, to seek changes that could have saved the UK Exchequer billions.

It is scandalous that the advice of Inland Revenue officials to seek a Treaty carve-out for tax, has been ignored by successive governments. It is clear that the approach of Ken Clarke and Gordon Brown has cost the UK Exchequer £billions as HMRC now loses tax case after tax case on EU law, when if the officials advice had been followed these cases may not have arisen.

The Labour government claims to have secured a red-line protecting the UK from the EU taking power over taxation. The evidence now shows that it waved a white flag.

Tax Truths for the Tory Party

The following was my comment to an article on Alistair Darling's planned 40 Billion Pound spending cuts in yesterday's Sunday Times, linked here :

Martin Cole wrote:

The other side of cuts to get to the 131 billion this week admitted as having been incurred in the bank bailout (with the likely impact 850 billion) are taxes.

A few minutes contemplating what can be taxed to supply these kind of sums will bring you inevitably to the only area where the excess money supply ended up - the housing market.

Whichever party forms the next government, the logical move will be a five year sliding property tax beginning at 5 per cent perhaps declining to one per cent over the five year parliament. All homes included.

The alternative, UK sovereign debt default and national bankruptcy. OR perhaps withdrawing from the EU, a more logical and equally effective cost saving measure which might by then be seen as preferable.

December 6, 2009 6:40 AM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk

Recommend? (10)

Report Abuse

Permalink

A tax such as this could be called the "Brown Levy"as it is a direct necessity following from his arrogance, negligence and incompetence ...... or was it all deliberate to destroy England?

The Conservative Party under Cameron states it will not contemplate EU withdrawal, more on that on Ironies Too, linked here. So how will the Conservative Party carry on paying the EU billions and billions of pounds every year while also incurring billions and billions of industrial costs and penalties from its absurd over-regulation and meet the banking debt costs incurred by Brown, already at 131 billion and likely to grow to 850 billion perhaps during the next Parliament?

Vote for a party offering an "in or out"referendum on the EU such as UKIP or the English Democrats.

English Democrat's Message for all Tories

Continuing to support the Cameron Conservative Party is to support those who have betrayed your country. Worse it will continue their hold on power!

The following is in this week's Evesham Observer:

Actual Tory vote collapsing

A startling local election result yesterday, where the Labour vote dropped by 9.6 % but the Tories fell by over 19% to lose their seat:

THANET Dane Valley result
Electorate 5,334; total vote 933; valid vote 930; spoiled votes 3. Turnout 17.4%
Sandra Hart (The Labour Party Candidate) 318 (34.2%) -9.6%
Bill Furness (Liberal Democrat) 260 (28.0%) +28%
Ingrid Spencer (The Conservative Party Candidate) 222 (23.9%) -19.&%
Wendy Allan (Independent) 130 (14.0%) – 4.3%
Labour gain from Conservative

A Message from Lord Pearson

Cameron complimented Cathy

When Geoffrey Van Orden, the veteran Tory MEP, suggested she should resign when Cameron won the general election, Ashton offered to let him listen to the supportive voicemail from Cameron after she won the post a fortnight ago at an EU summit. (The Guardian, here).

Brown's Government of former (?) Marxists sells out the City

Can the Conservative Party retain the Blair-aping David Cameron as leader if he continues to deny the nation a referendum on the EU?

Nick Clegg has today withdrawn the Lib/Dem commitment to an in or out referendum on the EU, surely one of Britain's main parties must have a policy to avert national economic suicide?

Read the terrible news from here thirty odd hours after the Lisbon Treaty took effect, that is all it took.

Ottawa, Sydney or Bermuda folks?

Far worse is of course to follow!

Another poll has the Tories down to 37%

The Independent will have the full results in tomorrow's edition, but read a summary from here.

The only hope for the country is a Labour defeat in the General Election, the best hope for a Labour defeat requires a Tory party split or a dumping of the shallow and untrustworthy David Cameron and his bunch of ineffectual lightweights.

Conservative Grass Roots awaken to the Cameron Threat

The following is from the blog Conservative Home, linked here

Cameron's Green Adviser is a tax-wise Non-Dom

From The Sunday Times,which report may be read in full from here.

Fair enough, I suppose, for an old school buddy of Vapid, advising on imaginary or fantasy green issues. BUT there can be no justification for Zac Goldsmith to be a Prospective Parliamentary Candidate as well, one presumes from the infamous and shameful 'A' list.

Monied cronies, such as this should be elevated to the House of Lords, like that other supporter of the increasingly clearly quite odious Dave Cameron , namely Lord Ashcroft. In such a manner their cronyism can be borne as a badge, warning the decent ordinary public and voters of their solied purchasing power!

Why the Tories are set to be crushed!

A good analysis of the latest YouGov polling results which now have the Tories consistently below 40%.

It all boils down to the Lisbon treachery of course, read the comment concerned from here.

After that poll we now have the Lord Pearson rejected deal coverage all over the media all day today. 50 UKIP seats could now be realistic!!

Cameron must be called to account over UKIP offer

The Times has a report that Lord Pearson offered Cameron through Tory Leader in the House of Lords, Lord Strathclyde, a deal on a referendum on the EU that could have saved the sovereignty AND democracy of Britain, or laid the blame and responsibility for their loss clearly at the feet of the electorate.

Cameron, EU lackey that he is, did not even have the courtesy to offer a reply. If no senior resignations from the Conservatives follow this weekend, especially following the later clarification given by Lord Pearson on the Today programme just now, then the Tories deserve no votes at the next election.

Couldn't Run a Piss-up in a Brewery!!!

The verdict of a prominent Conservative Council Leader on the Shadow Cabinet, read here.

Clearly the public agrees, three council seats were lost by the Tories this week.

UKIP has a new leader tonight..... will he inject some professionalism into the party organisation or flounder like the Conservative Party?

Conservatives must now be buried for good!

Eric Pickles, Conservative Party Chairman and Dictator was a Commie!

The report in the Sunday Times concerning the extreme left wing past of the present moronic Conservative Party Chairman surprises me not one jot!

The reduction of the Conservative Party lead to 6 points over Labour (37% to 31%) as reported in The Observer, also comes as no surprise.

The poll plunge will no doubt continue following Cameron's assertion on the Andrew Marr Show this morning that staying within the EU is one of his basic beliefs. More on that in my blog Ironies Too later today.

On Ukip Uncovered, here, I suggest a solution to the nation's ills.

John Strafford calls for revolt against Tory Central Office control and diktat

Listen to the broadcast where Cameron's Party Chairman tries to defend his odious rule which was at 0713 on the Radio 4 Today programme from this link.

In view of the polls the greatest danger now facing the country is Cameron's Conservative Party preparing to accept EU rule under this dreadful advertising man who has not one conservative principle in his make-up. Consider his side-kicks in the party Pickles and Ashcroft, are the shire constituency members or Turnip Taleban as they have been dubbed, really to vote for their imposed candidates?

Proconsul Cameron prepares for rule!!!!

"We need to use the state to remake society." David Cameron, quoted from his speech this evening on Conservative Home.

Andrew Marr and William Hague were jesting about "proconsuls"on Sunday morning, perhaps this is the reason a transcript of the interview has yet to appear on the BBC website. I had been thinking it was as a result of the grilling given Hague by Marr on Ashcroft's tax payments, residency status and promotion prospects together with Hague's disgraceful replies.

Some Conservatives are they not these two? One promoting state interference at every level of society for that is the essence of Cameron's extraordinary speech tonight, while his Deputy, on Sunday, seemed to suggest that whether or not UK taxes were properly paid was a matter of zero concern for a future Foreign Secretary!!

The Daily Mail, November 6, 2009

Betraying the Crown

THE Tories are promising a ‘referendum guarantee’ on all future transfers of power to Brussels. If a future government tries to transfer further competences from Britain to the EU, a national referendum would be required by law before it could be ratified. Have they not read the Treaty of Lisbon?

Article 47 gives the EU as a whole a legal personality, so the EU itself can ‘speak with one voice’ to ratify any future treaties on behalf of all 27 countries. This includes the power to go to war.

In the UK, to date, for many things, including the decision to fight wars or to ratify treaties, our Government uses the Royal Prerogative on behalf of the British Crown.

The power of the Crown is held in trust by the executive and passed on to the next government. Article 47 of the Lisbon Treaty means our Government has handed over the Royal Prerogative to foreigners.

Yet the power of the British Crown is the ultimate authority – or sovereignty – behind Parliament, so it is not in the power of the government to give away the Royal prerogative to anyone – and certainly not to foreigners.

By this action, not only our Government, but also the Crown, has been made subservient to the EU.

EU treaties are designed to be permanent, so given that the EU is planning for the next 50 years, the gift of the Royal Prerogative is one which cannot be taken back.

I believe this gift was not in the power of Ministers and that they could, at a future date, be held guilty of sedition against the state.

Is that clear enough for the Tories?

ANNE PALMER,

Wolverhampton, West Midlands

Only one potential leader among them.

The leader they have, Vapid Cameron, is a proven charlatan whose words are worthless.

Who is the potential leader?

The one on the right!! Who is he??

Peter Hitchens, a real Conservative!

The rest, no-marks, no morals and non-men

Cameron the Cast Iron Conman about to be fully revealed

As President Klaus has now signed the Lisbon Treaty and William Hague has confirmed his treachery be appearing on TV to announce there will be no referendum in the UK; we now wait for Dave Cameron tomorrow to confirm all this blog has always leveled at him, since the first moment his name first appeared as a likely contender for the Conservative Party leadership. Read the blog archives to find pretty well every scathing attack on this spineless man which the decent English vocabulary permits.

Now the test is for all other true conservatives and democrats.

We must wait for Cameron's speech before being able to finally judge, how many MP resignations or party whip withdrawals will follow? I bet none!

Lord Ashcroft remains a NO GO TOPIC on Conservative Home

Yesterday The Independent newspaper returned to the topic of Lord Ashcroft, descibed as the majority shareholder of the blg Conservative Home by that blog itself. One comment to that article on his Lordship was as follows:
+++++

Get rid of Ashcroft

prof_use wrote:

Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 10:01 pm (UTC)

Cameron needs to act here. This is a vote loser. The UK needs a clean competent govt to replace the awful Labour govt. This Ashcroft fellow is bad news. DC, get rid of him
+++++

Sound advice indeed, but is the broader party aware of the problem?

This morning the front page of The Observer targets Lord Ashcroft, with suddenly a link from Conservative Home. Strangely as follows:

Lord Ashcroft tipped for possible foreign policy role in a Tory Government - The Observer

Yet no mention, nor link, to another article in the same paper with the headline:

'Lord Ashcroft of Belize' facing eviction as country turns on him

, linked here,


In fact use their own Search facility on their blog for "Lord Ashcroft" and this is what you will get, click here.

If the editors of Conservative Home, Tim Montgomerie and Jonathan Isaby, wish to retain any credibility in the Blogosphere, rather than within Cameron's obviously unworthy Conservative Party, then they had better switch blogs this weekend!!

Conservative Home blog goes silent

Criticisms of Lord Ashcroft ignored on Conservative Home Blog

The Independent this morning ran three critical items on Lord Ashcroft as I noted here on Ironies Too:

+++++

Conservative Home blog goes silent

We wait with baited breath for the updating of the Conservative Home blog following the damaging stories and leading article in today's The Independent on the new shareholder in that blog and Chairman of Cameron's Conservative Party, Lord Ashcroft. Read it from here, here and here.

I have sent my own unsolicited advice to Tim Montgomerie on the subject of his blog. I will update developments which could restore hope for a true Conservative Party to re-emerge as they unfold.

posted by Martin at 8:49 AM 0 comment


+++++

The e-mail I sent to the editor of the Conservative Home blog was as follows:

Tim,

I have admired all you have achieved with Conservative Home but surely it is now time to change server to Blogger, which is very effective and requires no backers as it is free.

Conservative Home is Tim Montgomerie, you will be followed by Conservative voters.

The problems for Cameron, Ashcroft and the non-conservative party they have created must be resolved before the election, with Lord Pearson leading UKIP and these revelations in the paper today, a large responsibility has fallen upon your shoulders.

Good Luck,

"Conservative Home"blog, twigs truth on Cameron's Tories

Read this post and the comments, from here, probably not there for long so a re-post below:

CCHQ has trashed principle after principle in its manipulation of candidate selection

The decision by David Cameron to introduce all women shortlists (AWS) - a move he described as a "step too far" just three years ago - is the latest in a long line of decisions taken by the Tory leadership to control the selection of Tory candidates and has, in the process, eroded key conservative principles.

MERIT

It all began with the A-list. The candidates on the A-list (particularly the female candidates) performed less well in previous election campaigns than the men. 22 of the original A-listers achieved swings above the national average swing of 2.21% and 46 achieved below-average swings. Getting on to the A-list was not a rigorous process with candidates revealing that they faced very different interview processes. Some even had second chances.

Given that 70% of approved candidates are men (and the number of women applying to be Tory candidates was actually falling at one point) there was always an unfairness in half-women shortlists (HWS) - an unfairness that boiled over into rebellion at Dudley North. ConservativeHome warned that HWSs could have a perverse effect. We wrote this in August 2006: "Any attempt to impose half-women shortlists may backfire. Associations may, perversely, think that any woman in the final round is there to make up a quota rather than because of her intrinsic merits." That is exactly what has happened. The proportion of women selected has fallen since HWSs became compulsory.

DEMOCRACY

If Associations refused to accept HWSs they lost the right for all local members to have the final say in candidate selection.

Also under David Cameron's watch ordinary party members lost the right to deselect sitting MEPs. If they had not lost that right we might have seen Edward McMillan-Scott MEP deselected before he caused such trouble for the party since.

Another subversion of democracy was the decision to put women at the top of regional MEP lists even if they received fewer votes than men.

CCHQ expects volunteer activists to devote years of fundraising and envelope-stuffing to the party but they no longer trust them to choose their parliamentary candidates or their MEPs.

SOCIAL JUSTICE

We need more women MPs. We need them on grounds of fairness but also because a debate involving women is richer than one without. We also need more people from public sector backgrounds and people with experience of the voluntary and poverty-fighting sectors. I do not think it is helpful that quite so many Tory MPs are from the City, law, the south and from private schools. True diversity is about more than more women. If diversity was a key aim the criteria for the A-list were too superficial. ConservativeHome's own campaign to help lower income candidates has been consistently overlooked by CCHQ.

TRANSPARENCY

CCHQ tried to keep the A-list secret (something ConHome corrected) but the lesson on transparency was not learnt. CCHQ suppressed the data on membership numbers and turnout during last year's vote on non-incumbent MEP candidates.

LOCALISM

In all of the above the idea that local institutions are instinctively trusted by Team Cameron has been comprehensively trashed.

COURTESY

Throughout the whole process there has been a lack of courtesy to the candidates seeking a seat. They all make enormous sacrifices for the party and pay an annual fee to be on the candidates list but were not informed if they did not get on to second waves of the A-list. A ConHome straw poll found that candidates had to ring CCHQ at least three times before getting their phone calls returned.

***

CCHQ will justify AWS on the basis that they are necessary to correct an historical wrong. The same arguments have been used for all ethnic minority work contracts in the USA. Are the Conservatives now willing to support such contracts? They have surrendered any principled opposition to them with this decision on AWS.

Tim Montgomerie

October 22, 2009 at 07:38 | Permalink

Bad people acting to justify their appalling behaviour

Read a report on an address to a Conservative Association by Sean Gabb, as posted by the author from here.

Please read it all the way to this conclusion:

If you want to preserve this nation, you must be prepared for a radical jettisoning of what is no longer merely old, but also dead. The conservative challenge is to look beneath the plumage and save the dying bird.

Cameron should panic on quality of candidates - NOT their sex

The BBC reports that Cameron is once more fretting over the shortage of women and ethnic minorities on the Conservative Party candidate list.

A far greater problem that will cost an avalanche of votes at the next general election is the dishonesty of his sitting MPs AND the refusal to learn from past mistakes in that area by selection of similar candidates for the coming years. Consider these latest two taken from the Candidates section of the Conservative Home blog, linked here:

Oxbridge QC (Blair clone again -Life experience NIL) :

Stephen Phillips QC read Law at Oxford and after a short stint in the Welsh Guards and attending Sandhurst, he was called to the Bar in 1993 and appointed a QC earlier this year. He is also Chairman of the Governors of the only sign-bilingual school in Britain. Douglas Hogg will bequeath a notional majority of 12,687 over Labour. (Sleaford and North Hykeham).

"Deep experience of the NHS"- Great help for Britain's economic crisis!

Dr Philip Lee aged 39 and a bit years succeeds the disgraced Andrew Mackay in Bracknell. Another safe seat wasted unless a decent independent can quickly be found.

Unimpressive post-conference local government results

West End ward, Westminster
Con - 526 - 61% (+10)
Lab - 169 - 20% (+3)
Lib Dem - 108 - 12% (-2)
Green - 62 - 7% (-8)
Con hold (UKIP did not stand this time)

Penrith West ward, Eden
LD - 387 - 52% (+52)
Con - 157 - 21% (-18)
BNP - 102 - 14% (+14)
Ind - 58 -8% (-37)
Lab - 26 - 3%( -13)
Green - 18 - 2% (+2)
Lib Dem gain from Ind

Grange Hill ward, Epping Forest
Con - 453 - 52% (-32)
Lib Dem - 411 - 48% (+48)
Con hold (Lab did not stand this time)

March West ward, Fenland
Con - 830 -54% (-4)
Lab - 460 -30% (+30)
Lib Dem - 250 - 16% (-26)

David Cameron is Blair's lackey

Remind yourself of that fact and remember that he waved his own party to their feet as Blair left the chamber!



What self-governance will remain in Britain with Cameron as PM under President Blair?

Open letter to David Cameron from Anne Palmer JP

Address removed

22.9.2009.

The Rt Hon David Cameron MP

Leader of the Conservative Party

House of Commons,

London

SW1A OAA.

Dear Mr Cameron,

Although I am not in the Conservative Party, I have always voted for the Conservatives in a General election. However, as the EU instigates so very many of our Laws now and a great deal more should ‘Lisbon’ come into FORCE, we all, even our own MP’s will have to obey, I question why anyone would want to vote for any British political Party that, although elected by the people of this country, to speak for the people, do not do as the people wish. It is well known that the people were promised and should have had a referendum on the very constitutional EU Treaty.

Having just written that, and knowing the contents of that Treaty, I believe anyone that voted for it, may be violating their solemn Oath of Allegiance to the British Crown and the present wearer of it. If I just take the smallest Article (Article 47) in the Treaty of Lisbon, it gives the European Union as a whole, for the very first time, “legal personality” which allows the EU to “speak with one voice” for the whole of the EU on many subjects and at meetings and to ratify Treaties on behalf of all 27 Countries without debates in National Parliaments. War making Power? There is no mention that this is NOT so.

As far as the UK is concerned our Government uses the Royal Prerogative on behalf of the British Crown for many things and particularly, for ratifying Treaties. The power of the Crown is used through the Royal Prerogative. It is held in trust by Government Ministers and to pass on to the next maybe different Government to use. Through Article 47, it means that our Government has given the Royal Prerogative to foreigners to use through the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon. The power of the British Crown is the ultimate authority (sovereignty) of Parliament and its Treaty making instrument, the Royal Prerogative. It is not in the authority of Government to give away this Royal Prerogative to anyone and certainly not to foreigners, it is not in their ‘gift’ to give, for it belongs to The British Crown.

The Treaty, I believe, is contrary to our own Common law Constitution and Her Majesty’s Coronation Oath, "That no foreign Prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm, So help me God." ALL our politicians swear a solemn Oath of Allegiance to the Crown and through the Crown to this Country and its people before they can take their seat in Parliament. How then can they ratify Treaties that allows foreigners to ratify Treaties on our behalf, and for all the years to come?

I doubt any of us believe the people will continue voting or paying for a "pretendy" Government for long, especially as time goes by. This is not what we vote for them to do. All three major political parties are presently talking of cuts in spending. Stop paying the billions in “contributions” to the EU and paying the unlimited amounts in “fines” when this once sovereign Government does not always get EU laws right, and then everything will fall into place. Working with others and not ruled by them.

Has Government in ratifying this Treaty revoked the power of the Crown as exercised by Government denying the exclusive authority of the British Government to use the Royal Prerogative in those areas they have agreed to allow the EU to use the powers of the Royal Prerogative in their stead? In the doing, the EU “Binds the Crown and Government”. Not only is our Government made subservient to the EU, the Crown is also by this action. I write

of “The Crown”, for I recognise that the power of the Crown is the ultimate authority (sovereignty) of Parliament and that power, (sovereignty) is used by Government through the Royal Prerogative. It is that sovereign power this Government have given away to the European Union for Article 47. As the EU Treaties are designed for all time and the EU is planning for the next 50 years, it would seem to be a gift of which there is no return, given by a temporary Government, binding every new future Government and future Heirs to the throne. I submit this was not in the gift of ministers and that they could, at a future date, be held guilty of sedition against the State.

I am mindful that it was also the Conservatives that made Her Majesty a Citizen of Europe through the ratification of the Treaty of Maastricht. It is well known that two subjects of Her Majesty tried to bring charges of treason against the Government but it was deemed, as I understand it, by the then Attorney General as ‘not in the public’s interest’ to allow the case. (yet one rule of justice is that no man be judge in his own case, “non judex in causa sua”. However times change, and we also know that “Lisbon” changes (deepens) that EU citizenship, for the Treaty of Lisbon has ‘competence’ over all Nation States’ Constitutions and Laws. However, in spite of the Treaties ratified by this Government, or perhaps because of, if Lisbon goes through without the people having had their say in a referendum, the people’s allegiance to their own Country will become stronger and parts of their own Constitution, Magna Carta and the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9 will eventually be put to the test once more. It does not bode well for future peace.

Not many people have any trust left in Members of our Parliament and even less in the present Government. “Britain will not be bound by Treaties to which the British have not given assent”. That was written by William Reese-Mogg September 13 2009. Should you wish for my vote, I would need a total vow of commitment to hold a referendum whether the Treaty has been ratified or not and the Treaty withdrawn immediately whether all 27 States have ratified it or not. Never in the history of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties has anything like this happened before, although a Treaty has been withdrawn once, before all parties ratified. It is however, very questionable if the Treaty of Lisbon complies with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties own articles, for the Treaties should be clear and precise in order to be understood by all those to whom it applies. The Treaty of Lisbon is perhaps the most (deliberately) ‘muddled’ EU Treaty of all time and perhaps the last EU Treaty, for its acceptance will finally destroy the self-governing of each Nation State. I await your reply and actions with great interest.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Palmer. JP. (Written copy in the post.)

Conservative Home Blog to become the "Belize Bugle"?

The news of another Ashcroft coup was slipped out on the Conservative Home blog on a quiet Sunday, relish the sycophantic comments as the last shred of independence is finally ripped away from a once stimulating website, read it here.

Teetering Tories had better shift up a gear or two as it once again resumes its role as the only real blog with an independent and outside view of the Conservative Party! (Spot Iain Dale's comment in thethread of the above link and note that he too is now in league with the Tory Treasurer).

Massacred in local elections.

Finally the absence of conservative principles and policies seems to be coming home to haunt the Tories as now corrupted by Cameron.

Local polls last week as detailed on Conservative Home, linked here, spell out the full disaster where were it not for an ex-Ghurka scraping in by just four votes in a ward in Kent the results would have been a complete whitewash at a time when rumours regarding the health of the universally loathed Prime Minister are sweeping the internet.

Hallow, Malvern Hills LibDems gain from the Tories whose vote was down 16.5 per cent.

Ham, Plymouth Labour hold with a 2.7 per cent vote gain while the Tories lose 15.7 per cent.

Southwick Wiltshire an Independent gains from the Conservative who arrives third behind the LibDem with only 273 votes a fall of 34.3 per cent.

The contempt and insults heaped upon the Speaker of Parliament in various comment threads during the hours following the news that UKIP's Nigel Farage will stand against him at the General Election, appear to now be deservedly also coming the way of the party from which Bercow sprang which Cameron and his clique have so effectively contrived to be effectively bereft of worth.

Read about Brown's health, first here and then from here.